FAA proposes draft B-737 Max Training only for US carriers & registered aircraft only

The FAA has released a flight standardisation boardreport relating to B-737 Max pilot training. Soon after, an addendum was issued too. While FAA has clearly stated that the training required in the FSB is mandated for US air carriers & US registered aircrafts, other aviation authorities must take their own action for the return of the B-737 Max.Question, will the Indian regulator follow a systematic process of change management and not be rushed into the re-entry process? Will the FSB report adopted in toto and will the regulators draft training requirements be put out for public comments?
The key highlights are quoted below from the FAA website as of 7th Oct 2020:While this is an important step, several key milestones remain:Final Design Documentation and Technical Advisory Board (TAB) Report – The FAA will review Boeing’s final design documentation to evaluate compliance with all FAA regulations. The multi-agency TAB will also review the final Boeing submission and issue a f…

Air India B-787 fuel leak, should the crew start APU and increase risk?

fuel leak
Fuel Leak

What happened?

On 21st August 2017, M/s Air India Ltd Boeing 787-800 aircraft VT-ANE was involved in fuel leak incident during taxi to the runway while operating flight AI - 131 (Mumbai to London). Aircraft started taxiing and after about 02 minutes in the taxi to the Runway 27, fuel imbalance message was displayed to the crew. The crew of M/s Oman Air flight OMA-202, which was taxiing behind AI-131, observed the fuel coming out from the RH wing and reported same to the air traffic controller (ATC) informed AI about the fuel leak immediately. Aircraft stopped on taxiway and crew switched off both the engines. Approximately 1850 Kg of fuel was leaked from the aircraft. No human injury was reported in the incident.

Why did happen?

The exact cause of the fuel leak could not be ascertained. However, it is suspected that the presence of debris, in the Right main tank boost pump outlet check valve, has contributed to the fuel leak.

Should the APU have been started?

The fuel leak from the wing exposes the aircraft to the risk of a fire. The heavy flow of fuel from the wing tanks need a source of ignition and more than the fuel, its the fuel vapours that are susceptible to catching fire. In this scenario, there is a need to look at the fire triangle.

Image result for fire triangle
Fire triangle

In the fire triangle, there is no control over the 2 factors, fuel & oxygen which in this scenario were in abundance. The third element of heat/ignition had to be eliminated. Logically, all engines should have been shut down as soon as possible.

The crew took almost 2min 30 sec to shut down the engines and in the process added another source of heat by starting the Auxillary Power Unit (APU). The APU is a small engine mounted at the tail section and used primarily for supplying air and electricity while the aircraft is on the ground with the engines switched OFF.

Point to ponder

Most airlines follow the procedure of removing all sources of heat and/or ignition. This would mean that all engines and the APU would need to be switched off in order to eliminate the risk.


  1. Thanks. Link is working now. https://dgca.gov.in/digigov-portal/Upload?flag=iframeAttachView&attachId=150006152


Post a comment

Popular posts from this blog

Etihad incident at Calicut,June'19, highlighted airport infrastructure issues. This could have been the wakeup call!

IndiGo flight followed a similar flight pattern and landed safely before the ill-fated Air India Express crashed

Much defended, Kozhikode Runway RESA & Runway Strip do not meet ICAO standards